Anytime that a hard-nosed analysis is put forth of who our rulers are, of how their political and economic interests interlock, it is invariably denounced by Establishment liberals and conservatives (and even by many libertarians) as a "conspiracy theory of history," "paranoid," "economic determinist," and even "Marxist." These smear labels are applied across the board, even though such realistic analyses can be, and have been, made from any and all parts of the economic spectrum, from the John Birch Society to the Communist Party. The most common label is "conspiracy theorist," almost always leveled as a hostile epithet rather than adopted by the "conspiracy theorist" himself.
In characteristically flamboyant style Chris Floyd pricks the bubble of British Establishment fury at Jeremy Corbyn's bid for the UK Labour Party leadership. Though apparently "unelectable" to the likes of Tony Blair (friend of "dictators and other assorted sleazebags"), Corbyn's campaign has seen "more than 400,000 people" join the ranks of the Labour Party, in sharp contrast to the exodus of "200,000 members" during the Blair years, "most of them stage left."
Following David Cameron's address on "extremism" on 20 July 2015, the inimitable Guzzy Bear Oh Yeh! kindly posts an open video message of congratulations to our esteemed Prime Minster, praising him for a "wonderful speech" that is "surely going to unite us all in this battle against the radicalisation and extremism amongst young people in our nation." *
Pondering further UK Prime Minister David Cameron's remarks on Monday about "extremism" (which Glenn Greenwald tweeted as "one of the creepiest and most authoritarian speeches you'll ever hear"), it's nice to know we can turn to one of his key colleagues for further clarification. Quizzed in May by BBC Radio 4 Today Programme's John Humphrys as to what the government means by "extremism" and the "British values" it apparently offends, Mrs. May seemed to be unable to explain.
"Afshin Rattansi goes underground with James G. Connell III, attorney at the US Defense Department, who represents Aamar al-Baluchi. Aamar stands accused of financing 9/11, and the CIA-backed Hollywood film Zero Dark Thirty even based a character on him. James explains how Hollywood producers and directors works with the CIA, and why the US considers itself to be exempt from many human rights treaties." *
Late last year, Germany’s broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW) investigated what turned out to be hundreds of trucks a day carrying billions of dollars in supplies, flowing across the Turkish border into Syria and directly into the hands of the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS).
The border crossing near the Turkish city of Oncupinar, approximately 100km west of the Syrian city of Kobani, is apparently only one of many such crossings where ISIS fighters, weapons, and materiel move directly under the watch and apparent assistance of NATO.
Garth Kennedy & Dr. Mike Spaulding, "LFR Show 34", LikeFlintRadio.com (01 July 2015)
An excellent discussion on Like Flint Radio, between host Garth Kennedy and guest Pastor Mike Spaulding (of Soaring Eagle Radio), on the subject of biblical hermeneutics: how to read and interpret the Scriptures according to the guidelines implicit in the texts themselves.
For the tenth anniversary of The London Bombings (7/7) - and by way of counterpoint to the mainstream narrative that no significant questions remain - TMR takes the opportunity to repost our detailed interview with writer, researcher and film-maker Tom Secker from 2014.
Drawing upon his several years of research, Tom shares with us many of the problems with the official story, delves into the backstories behind the alleged suicide bombers, and uncovers layer upon layer of suspicious information suggesting that 7/7 may have been a false-flag terror event. Tom also discusses how, in the run-up to the attacks, predictive programming in popular culture may have shaped public perception of 7/7, and how cognitive infiltration as a double bluff has negatively impacted the quest for 7/7 truth.
If you become stuck in a boring July 4 hot air speech, distract yourself with this question: Are the values that Western civilization allegedly represents still extant? You don’t need to get heavy into philosophy. See if you can find any of the professed values reflected in current events.
The social engineering of populations through the psychological meme "conspiracy theory" or "conspiracy theorist" has been the subject of a number of programmes at TMR over the past couple of years (here, here and here), and it continues to be a matter of great concern to me. As more and more moves are made by the political elite to associate with terrorism anyone who questions official narratives about events such as 9/11, or a whole host of other examples of State Crimes Against Democracy, the more important it becomes for people to call this engineering out for what it really is: tyranny.
An effective short video series assessing the explanations given by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the collapse initiations of the Twin Towers on 9/11, using footage from presentations by key 9/11 researchers. (I am pleased to say the series includes excerpts from TMR interviews with Kevin Ryan and Tony Szamboti.)
A shocking admission by the editor of the world’s most respected medical journal, The Lancet, has been virtually ignored by the mainstream media. Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-chief of the Lancet recently published a statement declaring that a shocking amount of published research is unreliable at best, if not completely false, as in, fraudulent.